Fact-Checking Claims About USAID Funding

2 months ago 28

You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.

Fact Check

Trump administration officials have misled about how the aid agency is spending its funding, in an effort to cite widespread “waste.”

Workers removed signage from the headquarters of the U.S. Agency for International Development after the federal agency was dismantled by the Trump administration.Credit...Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images

Linda Qiu

Published Feb. 8, 2025Updated Feb. 9, 2025, 12:50 a.m. ET

Top officials in the Trump administration and allies in Congress, eager to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development, have accused the agency of misusing taxpayer funds. But many of their claims were misleading or lacked context.

The agency, long a target for conservative critics who have questioned the value of foreign aid, has been subject to sharp upheaval in the last week. After freezing foreign aid for 90 days, the Trump administration said it would drastically reduce the agency’s work force, although a federal judge temporarily paused elements of the plan on Friday.

The speed and scale of the efforts to gut U.S.A.I.D. are part of a larger bid by Mr. Trump and his allies to cut costs across the federal government.

Here is a fact-check of their claims about the agency.

What Was Said

Image

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, center left, leaving a joint news conference with President Rodrigo Chaves of Costa Rica on Tuesday. Mr. Rubio has taken over U.S.A.I.D.Credit...Pool photo by Mark Schiefelbein

“In some cases with U.S.A.I.D., 10, 12, 13 percent, maybe less, of the money was actually reaching the recipient, and the rest was going into the overhead and the bureaucracy.”
— Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in a news conference on Tuesday

This is misleading. Mr. Rubio was likely referring to a January report from U.S.A.I.D. showing that about $2.1 billion, or 12.1 percent of its funding, went directly to local partners. But that does not mean that 80 to 90 percent of funding was spent on “overhead and bureaucracy.” In fact, most of the agency’s funding is channeled through other recipients like American companies and charities as well as public international organizations.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Read Entire Article
Olahraga Sehat| | | |