2 days ago
6
You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
Trump allies have called for Judge James E. Boasberg to be investigated and impeached after decisions that questioned the administration’s respect for the rule of law.
Feb. 1, 2026
A high-ranking federal appeals judge dismissed an ethics complaint filed by the Justice Department against Judge James E. Boasberg, whose rulings repeatedly raised questions about the Trump administration’s respect for the rule of law, including regarding the deportation of Venezuelans to a maximum-security prison in El Salvador.
The seven-page dismissal order found that Chad Mizelle, the former chief of staff to Attorney General Pam Bondi, failed to substantiate allegations that Judge Boasberg had violated the Code of Conduct for United States Judges with comments he was accused of making at a private meeting of judges. Even if the comments had been substantiated, the order said, there was nothing inappropriate about them.
The order was signed by Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which posted it to its website this weekend. Mr. Mizelle, the Justice Department and Judge Boasberg did not respond to requests for comment on Sunday.
The complaint, which was filed in July, coincided with a broad and ongoing effort by administration officials and their allies to attack the credibility of judges who rule against the Trump administration, and in some cases to call for their impeachment. Judge Boasberg, the chief of the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, became a particular focus after he attempted to block the deportations to El Salvador, then attempted to open an inquiry into why planes headed for the prison did not turn around, despite a court order.
Ms. Bondi had trumpeted the complaint against Judge Boasberg on social media, where she claimed that he had “undermined the integrity of the judiciary.”
Mr. Mizelle’s complaint claimed that, during a closed-door meeting with other judges last March, Judge Boasberg had expressed concern that President Trump might disregard court orders, triggering a constitutional crisis. That, the complaint argued, was evidence of bias against the administration and amounted to an attempt by the judge to “improperly influence” his colleagues.
