Government Watchdog Drops Inquiries Into Mass Firings of Probationary Workers

3 hours ago 3

You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.

Experts in federal employment law said the Trump administration’s justifications to end the investigations were baffling at best.

A sign that reads “Save the Country, Save the Civil Service!” is held in the air, with the U.S. Capitol in the background.
Members of the American Federation of Government Employees union protesting budget cuts and layoffs near the Capitol in February. Probationary workers were the target of the first round of staff reductions.Credit...Samuel Corum for The New York Times

Eileen Sullivan

By Eileen Sullivan

Eileen Sullivan covers changes to the federal work force under the Trump administration. She reported from Washington.

  • April 21, 2025, 10:00 p.m. ET

The independent government agency charged with protecting federal workers’ rights will drop its inquiry into the more than 2,000 complaints that the Trump administration had improperly fired probationary employees, according to emailed notices received by five workers and reviewed by The New York Times.

The agency, the Office of Special Counsel, told affected employees that it had concluded that it could not pursue the claims of unlawful termination in part because they were fired not for individual cause, but en masse as part of President Trump’s “governmentwide effort to reduce the federal service.”

The decision effectively eliminates one of the few avenues government employees had to challenge their terminations. It comes as Mr. Trump has forced out the office’s leader and replaced him for now with a loyal member of his cabinet, Doug Collins, the secretary of veterans affairs.

The office is charged with protecting whistle-blowers from retaliation, which is the reason for its independent status and a Senate-confirmed leader. But it also scrutinizes other employment-related issues, including investigations into claims of prohibited personnel practices, or PPPs, such as discrimination, nepotism or an attempt to coerce political activity.

Reached for comment, the Office of Special Counsel declined to say how many of the more than 2,000 fired probationary employees with pending complaints actually received the notice.

Experts in federal employment law said the justifications to end the investigations were baffling at best.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Read Entire Article
Olahraga Sehat| | | |