You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
The math of the G.O.P.’s goals makes the move almost unavoidable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23a57/23a57e569df3f1479fd042bae867c16d3710f2b0" alt=""
Feb. 25, 2025, 9:01 p.m. ET
The House passed a budget resolution Tuesday night after the speaker, Mike Johnson, persuaded several Republican lawmakers, including those who have expressed reservations about possible Medicaid cuts, to support the bill.
In theory, the budget, which kicks off the process of passing an extension of tax cuts enacted in 2017 and up to $2 trillion in spending cuts meant to partly offset them, could become law without significant cuts to Medicaid. But it won’t be easy.
Spending overseen by the House Committee
On Energy and Commerce
$25 trillion
Medicaid
Medicare
Other
Health
Non-health
Cuts required
$880 billion
Spending overseen by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce
$25 trillion
Medicaid
Medicare
Other
Health
Non-health
Cuts required
$880 billion
That process has a few more steps: For one, the Senate has to adopt this budget resolution. Then both houses of Congress will also need to write and pass legislation that follows its instructions.
The budget resolution itself is silent on whether Congress cuts Medicaid, which provides health coverage to 72 million poor and disabled Americans. But it instructs the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over the program, to cut spending by $880 billion over the next decade. If the committee can’t save at least that much, the entire effort could be imperiled because of the special process Congress is using to avoid a Senate filibuster.
It’s not so simple as finding the cuts elsewhere. The special process, known as budget reconciliation, means Republicans will have to find all $880 billion from within the committee’s jurisdiction. That leaves them with fewer options than one might think.